US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,247
TEAMER v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00200
Petitioner: KERRICK VAN TEAMER
Respondent: RICKY S DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCUMSEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2024cv00203
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER D MCCUMSEY
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUMPH v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00191
Petitioner: TAVARES RUMPH
Respondent: RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BIVENS v. SZCZECINA
as 4:2024cv00185
Petitioner: JEROME E BIVENS
Respondent: M SZCZECINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOWARD v. BROTON
as 4:2024cv00187
Petitioner: KIRK H0WARD
Respondent: JENNIFER A BROTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KENON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff: CARLOS S KENON
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEREZ V SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv00178
Petitioner: Julio A. Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KIRKLAND v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2024cv00077
Petitioner: TIMOTHY M KIRKLAND
Respondent: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
as 4:2024cv00164
Petitioner: REGINALD HILL
Respondent: WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KNOX v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00166
Plaintiff: MICHAEL KNOX
Defendant: RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?