Florida Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,277
Naja v. UMA Education, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Naja
Defendant:
UMA Education, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Rivera v. Adiser Orlando, LLC
as 6:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Marieann Rivera
Defendant:
Adiser Orlando, LLC. and Adiser Orlando, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Reyes v. The District Board of Trustees of Broward College, Florida
as 0:2024cv60238
Plaintiff:
Violeta Katrina Reyes
Defendant:
The District Board of Trustees of Broward College, Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Seay v. Lineage Logistics Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Shawn H. Seay
Defendant:
Lineage Logistics Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Peer v. Monro, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Darrin S. Peer
Defendant:
Monro, Inc., d/b/a The Tire Choice & Total Car Care, Monro Muffler Brake, Inc., d/b/a Tire Choice Auto Service Centers, Monro, Inc. doing business as The Tire Choice & Total Car Care and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Rodriguez v. Riverstone Communities, LLC.
as 6:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Armando Rodriguez
Defendant:
Riverstone Communities, LLC.
Williams v. City Furniture Inc
as 0:2024cv60179
Plaintiff:
Rodgery Williams
Defendant:
City Furniture Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Budd v. Garber Delray, Inc
as 9:2024cv80105
Plaintiff:
Gregory Budd
Defendant:
Garber Delray, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Curtis Cochran v. Pall Aeropower Corporation
as 8:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Christina Curtis Cochran
Defendant:
Pall Aeropower Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Lezcano v. MasTec Utility Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv20210
Plaintiff:
Elianys Lezcano
Defendant:
MasTec Utility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
