D.C. Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 344
PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG v. PANASONIC CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv01750
Plaintiff:
PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG
Defendant:
PANASONIC CORPORATION and PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
GLYCOBIOSCIENCES, INC. v. FIDIA FARMACEUTICI S.P.A.
as 1:2015cv00592
Plaintiff:
GLYCOBIOSCIENCES, INC.
Defendant:
FIDIA FARMACEUTICI S.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Unitronics 1989 R G Ltd., et al v. Samy Gharb
as 15-7036
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Unitronics 1989 R G Ltd. and Unitronics, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Samy Gharb
Samy Gharb v. Unitronics, Inc., et al
as 15-7037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Samy Gharb
Defendant - Appellee:
Unitronics, Inc., Haim Shani, Seth Frielich and others
Samy Gharb v. Unitronics, Inc., et al
as 15-7038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Samy Gharb
Defendant - Appellee:
Unitronics, Inc., Haim Shani, Seth Frielich and others
GHARB v. MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00328
Plaintiff:
SAMY GHARB
Defendant:
MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORPORATION, RYO TOKUNAGA, AKIRA FUEUSAWA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
GHARB v. UNITRONICS INC et al
as 1:2014cv01635
Plaintiff:
SAMY GHARB
Defendant:
UNITRONICS INC , HAIM SHANI, SETH FRIELICH and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
GHARB v. UNITRONICS INC et al
as 1:2014cv01636
Plaintiff:
SAMY GHARB
Defendant:
UNITRONICS INC , HAIM SHANI, SETH FRIELICH and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
GLYCOBIOSCIENCES INC. v. DARA BIOSCIENCES, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv01281
Plaintiff:
GLYCOBIOSCIENCES INC.
Defendant:
DARA BIOSCIENCES, INC. and HELSINN HEALTHCARE SA
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SMARTDOOR HOLDINGS, INC. v. EDMIT INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00657
Defendant:
EDMIT INDUSTRIES, INC., ADA EZ and DAVID JOHAN VAN TUYL
Plaintiff:
SMARTDOOR HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
