D.C. Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 212
Wade Robertson v. William Cartinhour, Jr., et al
as 12-7049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wade Robertson
Defendant - Appellee:
William C. Cartinhour, Jr., Vesna Kustudic, Tanja Milicevic, also known as Tanja Popovic and others
ABOU-HUSSEIN v. MABUS et al
as 1:2012cv00913
Plaintiff:
HAMDY ALEX ABOU-HUSSEIN
Defendant:
RAYMOND EDWIN MABUS, JR. and NAVAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JENKINS v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2012cv00896
Plaintiff:
LINDSAY JENKINS
Defendant:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., LUCY CHERNOW BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUFFORD v. GEESING et al
as 1:2012cv00594
Plaintiff:
DIANNE B. HUFFORD
Defendant:
JACOB GEESING, BANK UNITED FSB, CAMNER, LIPSITZ, POLLER, LLC, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
MAY v. OBAMA
as 1:2012cv00271
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MAY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
ROGERS v. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 1:2011cv02120
Plaintiff:
ANNA MILLARD ROGERS
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
ROBERTSON v. CARTINHOUR et al
as 1:2011cv01919
Plaintiff:
WADE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. CARTINHOUR, Jr., VESNA KUSTUDIC, TANJA MILICEVIC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
BANKS v. FINLEY FINE JEWELERS COMPANY-SELIGMAN AND LATZ INCORPORATED AND GIMBLES et al
as 1:2011cv01880
Plaintiff:
IRA R. BANKS
Defendant:
FINLEY FINE JEWELERS COMPANY-SELIGMAN AND LATZ INCORPORATED AND GIMBLES, STERLING MERCHANDISE, ARTHUR ANDERSON JEWELERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LU v. LEZELL et al
as 1:2011cv01815
Plaintiff:
YING QING LU
Defendant:
MARK LEZELL and ISAM GHOSH
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
