D.C. Circuit Real Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 782
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2026cv02230
Plaintiff:
Samuel E Lynch
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
LYNCH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2026cv02239
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL E LYNCH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) v. WALGREEN CO.
as 1:2026cv02243
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
MENGESHA v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2026cv02227
Plaintiff:
HENOCK A. MENGESHA
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
BERG et al v. U.S. BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2026cv02200
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW A. BERG, KHEPRA KESUANU ANU and BEVERLY GREEN
Defendant:
U.S. BANK, N.A., BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, HOWARD N. BIERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION v. MULLIN et al
as 1:2026cv02127
Plaintiff:
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION
Defendant:
MARKWAYNE MULLIN, RODNEY SCOTT and ROSARIO VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SMITH et al v. HUD/COMPU-LINK HECM et al
as 1:2026cv02120
Plaintiff:
RENEE SMITH and GABRIELLE DUBOSE
Defendant:
HUD/COMPU-LINK HECM and COMPU-LINK/ANDERSON LAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Karen Hylton v. District of Columbia Office of Risk Management, et al
as 26-5167
Plaintiff:
Karen Hylton
Defendant:
District of Columbia Office of Risk Management, Muriel Bowser, WC Smith and Agents and others
Rifat Shafique v. USMS
as 26-5162
Plaintiff:
Rifat Shafique
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
MCKINNEY v. BIRCH
as 1:2026cv01418
Plaintiff:
DUANE MCKINNEY
Defendant:
KENNARD BIRCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
