D.C. Circuit Real Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 75
TEL-COURT COOPERATIVE, INC. v. ESTATE OF IRENE DAVIS
as 1:2016cv00902
Plaintiff:
TEL-COURT COOPERATIVE, INC.
Defendant:
ESTATE OF IRENE DAVIS and GLENN A. DAVIS
Counter_claimant:
ESTATE OF IRENE DAVIS
Counter_defendant:
TEL-COURT COOPERATIVE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
TIBBITS v. WOODS
as 1:2016cv00630
Plaintiff:
SVETLANA TIBBITS
Defendant:
CHESTER WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. WOODYARD, SR. et al
as 1:2016cv00193
Plaintiff:
CHARLES L. HARPER
Defendant:
LUXURY 4 LESS.NET, LLC and CHARLTON WOODYARD, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
2000 L OWNER, L.L.C. v. UNIVERSAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPANY
as 1:2015cv01969
Plaintiff:
2000 L OWNER, L.L.C.
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
SMITH v. MAYOR, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv01798
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE D. SMITH
Defendant:
MAYOR, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CONSUMER AND REGULATORY ADMINISTRATION , SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
UNIVERSAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPANY v. 2000 L OWNER, L.L.C.
as 1:2015cv01803
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPANY
Defendant:
2000 L OWNER, L.L.C.
Counter_claimant:
2000 L OWNER, L.L.C.
Counter_defendant:
2000 L OWNER, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
YANG FIRE, LLC v. ASFAHA
as 1:2015cv00594
Defendant:
NIGIST ASFAHA
Plaintiff:
YANG FIRE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAG ENTERPRISES, INC. v. RAYFORD et al
as 1:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
GAG ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant:
LEONARD RAYFORD and JASON RAYFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KORNMANN et al v. JOHNSON
as 1:2014cv01677
Plaintiff:
MARK A. KORNMANN and CALVIN GERALD-KORNMANN
Defendant:
JONATHAN JOHNSON and CAPTIOL MANAGEMENT PARTNERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GRAHAM v. OTEY
as 1:2014cv01267
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE GRAHAM
Defendant:
MELVIN OTEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
