D.C. Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 5,567
JONES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv03627
Plaintiff:
HELEN M. JONES
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BLAYLOCK v. STARKE et al
as 1:2023cv03606
Plaintiff:
DAN M BLAYLOCK
Defendant:
PETRA SMELTZER STARKE, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KEOWN v. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL AIR RAIL TRANSPORTATION WORKERS
as 1:2023cv03570
Plaintiff:
DAVID KEOWN and DIANA ANGUS
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL AIR RAIL TRANSPORTATION WORKERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
ADAMKAVICIUS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv03571
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ADAMKAVICIUS, JOYCE MEHRER, KEVIN MEHRER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
WALKER v. SANOFI US SERVICES, INC.et al
as 1:2023cv03496
Defendant:
SANOFI US SERVICES, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., INC. and SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ZELLER v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv03497
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J ZELLER, III
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
KAVANAGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03503
Plaintiff:
ISABELLA KAVANAGH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
CARY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv03469
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL CARY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
CROWE et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv03461
Plaintiff:
SONISE CROWE and SONYA MULDROW
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
