D.C. Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 4,008
Eric Hill v. Peter Krauthamer
as 23-7125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant / Appellee:
Peter A. Krauthamer
BRAXTON v. ROPER
as 1:2023cv03018
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
CPL. ROPER and ROPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAXTON v. PIPE
as 1:2023cv03023
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
JUDITH PIPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Braxton v. USA
as 23-5221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
David Rudometkin, et al v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 23-5218
Plaintiff / Appellee:
David J. Rudometkin, Corry P. Brooks and Robert L. Barnett, III, and others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alexander L. Driskill
Defendant / Appellee:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, in his capacity as the Secretary of Defense
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 23-5213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and others
GELIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02855
Plaintiff:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
HEMPHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02865
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL ANTIONE HEMPHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, JULIAN CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Nelson v. State of Florida, et al
as 23-7117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Nelson
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Florida and Florida Department of Corrections
MITHAVAYANI v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2023cv02764
Plaintiff:
ANWAR MITHAVAYANI
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
