US District Court for the District of Columbia Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 64
PROCTOR v. TITLE 4-D et al
as 1:2017cv01931
Plaintiff:
RAPHEAL PROCTOR
Defendant:
TITLE 4-D , AGGIE RHODES, ADIA L. MELENDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545
LOGISTICS SYSTEMS INCORPORATED v. LEWIS
as 1:2017cv01786
Plaintiff:
LOGISTICS SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
Defendant:
KHARY LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
LOUCKA v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2017cv01375
Plaintiff:
WESLEY LOUCKA
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DAVITA INC. v. EMBASSY OF THE STATE OF KUWAIT
as 1:2017cv00505
Plaintiff:
DAVITA INC.
Defendant:
EMBASSY OF THE STATE OF KUWAIT
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
SMS CAPITAL, LLC v. AMEDCA OREGON, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01626
Plaintiff:
SMS CAPITAL, LLC
Defendant:
AMEDCA OREGON, LLC, ALAN FISHER and MATTHEW LOBENE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BILLUPS v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS
as 1:2016cv01502
Defendant:
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS
Plaintiff:
SCOTT CHRISTOPHER BILLUPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOMEZ et al v. DMY ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01397
Plaintiff:
OSCAR ANTONIO GOMEZ , MARTIN E. VARGAS , JOSE LUIS RAMOS ALEGRIA and others
Defendant:
DMY ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC and WEIYI MA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2016cv01211
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Defendant:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: TEMPORARILY OUT OF ORDER
MULTIMODAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC v. CHEMONICS INTERNATIONAL INC .
as 1:2016cv01030
Plaintiff:
MULTIMODAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
CHEMONICS INTERNATIONAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HERRICK, FEINSTEIN LLP v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
HERRICK, FEINSTEIN LLP
Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
