US District Court for the District of Columbia Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 177
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANACOSTIA BIBLE CHURCH
as 1:2008cv01676
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANACOSTIA BIBLE CHURCH
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
CALDWELL v. UNITED STATES TAX COURT et al
as 1:2008cv01427
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROBERT CALDWELL, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES TAX COURT, PETER J. PANUTHOS, DOUGLAS SHULMAN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ACKERMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv01136
Plaintiff:
PETER ACKERMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KONOWNITZINE
as 1:2008cv00927
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALEXIS KONOWNITZINE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
HINES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00914
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. HINES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00849
Plaintiff:
HAROLD D. LONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CLYBURN
as 1:2008cv00788
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN B. CLYBURN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
ACKERMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00722
Plaintiff:
PETER ACKERMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SANDERS
as 1:2008cv00683
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HARRY SANDERS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANACOSTIA BIBLE CHURCH
as 1:2008cv00685
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANACOSTIA BIBLE CHURCH
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
