District of District of Columbia Other Statutes Cases

Cases filed

Cases 31 - 40 of 8,819
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2015cv00690
Plaintiff: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: Freedom of Information Act
TAYLOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2015cv00685
Plaintiff: TIFFANI TAYLOR
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Education: Handicapped Child Act
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2015cv00684
Plaintiff: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: Freedom of Information Act
TKC AEROSPACE, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2015cv00680
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Plaintiff: TKC AEROSPACE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Freedom of Information Act
AMERICAN LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2015cv00682
Plaintiff: AMERICAN LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. , AMERICAN LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERS, L.P. , AMERICAN LOGISTICSINTERNATIONAL WAREHOUSING & DISTRIBUTION PARTNERS, L.P. and others
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: Administrative Procedure Act
RETROPHIN, INC. v. QUESTCOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 1:2015mc00537
Plaintiff: RETROPHIN, INC.
Defendant: QUESTCOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. SECRET SERVICE
as 1:2015cv00673
Plaintiff: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant: U.S. SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: Freedom of Information Act
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER v. UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2015cv00667
Plaintiff: ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER
Defendant: UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: Freedom of Information Act
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.