District of Columbia Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,917
JIDEANI v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2024cv01771
Plaintiff: ONYINYE JIDEANI
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE FINANCE and DEPARTMENT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF HEALTH CARE OMBUDSMAN AND BILL OF RIGHTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BERTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01750
Plaintiff: RONALD P. BERTON
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITY HEALTH CARE INC. and THOSE UNKNOWN
HINTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv01570
Petitioner: LEROY HINTON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LETTIERI v. NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTION CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv01424
Plaintiff: DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant: NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTION CENTER and FEDERAL MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HATHMAN v. HOLBROOK
as 1:2024cv01496
Plaintiff: LADERAL A.C. HATHMAN
Defendant: MICHEAL HOLBROOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
OLD v. USA
as 1:2024cv01544
Petitioner: MICHAEL CLARK OLD
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MAYO v. USA
as 1:2024cv01430
Petitioner: DECONDI DANTE MAYO
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LETTIERI v. FEDERAL MARSHALS et al
as 1:2024cv01408
Plaintiff: DAVID CARMINE LETTIERI
Defendant: FEDERAL MARSHALS and NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv01428
Petitioner: JAMES B.V. CROSBY
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CONNER v. LANDRY
as 1:2024cv01208
Plaintiff: ALBERTUS CONNER, JR.
Defendant: JEFF LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?