District of Columbia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,751
LOWE v. MIYARES et al
as 1:2023cv00865
Plaintiff:
MARK LOWE
Defendant:
JASON MIYARES, CRAIG STALLARD, HAROLD CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
JORGE E. HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COX v. FOSTER
as 1:2023cv00757
Petitioner:
CARLOS D. COX, JR.
Respondent:
COREY FOSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GRISSOM v. DEHAAN
as 1:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE GRISSOM
Defendant:
SUE DEHAAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00738
Not Classified By Court:
COLETTE S. PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
HARRIS SR. v. US DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv00705
Petitioner:
STEVEN JERMAINE HARRIS SR.
Respondent:
US DEPT OF JUSTICE and US DEPT OF INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAHLMAN v. LANE et al
as 1:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID STAHLMAN
Defendant:
KATHY P. LANE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., BILL CLINTON, BETH GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUERTA v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE GUSTAVO HUERTA
Defendant:
COLETES PETERS and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
TAQUAN WRIGHT
Defendant:
COLETES PETERS and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
