U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,555
Magna Mirrors of America, Inc. v. SMR Automotive Mirrors UK Ltd
as 23-1679
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAGNA MIRRORS OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SMR AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS USA INC., SMR AUTOMOTIVE MIRRORS STUTTGART GMBH, SMR AUTOMOTIVE VISION SYSTEMS MEXICO S.A. DE C.V. and others
Vroom, Inc. v. Sidekick Technology, LLC
as 23-1667
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VROOM, INC., VROOM AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, dba Vroom, dba Texas Direct Auto, CARSTORY, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SIDEKICK TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Ottah v. National Grid
as 23-1666
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHIKEZIE OTTAH
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL GRID
PS Products Inc. v. Panther Trading Co. Inc.
as 23-1665
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PS PRODUCTS INC. and BILLY PENNINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
PANTHER TRADING CO. INC.
United Services Automobile Association v. PNC Bank N.A.
as 23-1639
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellant:
PNC BANK N.A.
Osseo Imaging, LLC v. Planmeca USA Inc.
as 23-1627
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OSSEO IMAGING, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
PLANMECA USA INC.
DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. v. Veterinary Orthopedic Implants, Inc.
as 23-1614
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC. and DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
VETERINARY ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, INC.
DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. v. Veterinary Orthopedic Implants, Inc.
as 23-1615
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC. and DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
FIDELIO CAPITAL AB, dba Ossium Group
Dali Wireless Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications LLC
as 23-1610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALI WIRELESS INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Wireless Discovery LLC v. Grindr, Inc.
as 23-1591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WIRELESS DISCOVERY LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
GRINDR, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
