Second Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,142
Baker v. Amaral et al
as 1:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Lewis Baker
Defendant:
Walter Amaral, Doug Bewsher, Scott Genereux and others
Champ Key Limited v. Canoo Inc.
as 1:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Champ Key Limited
Defendant:
Canoo Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Ristea v. Botteri et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Octavian Ristea
Defendant:
Philippe Botteri, Daniel Dines, Carl Eschenbach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Vomvolakis v. Mehta et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Maria Vomvolakis
Defendant:
VIMAL MEHTA, Richard Steinhart, PETER MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Hohimer Wealth Management LLC v. Dougan et al
as 1:2023cv11138
Plaintiff:
Hohimer Wealth Management LLC
Defendant:
Brady W. Dougan, Eric Varvel, James L. Amine and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1905 Disclosure of Confidential Information
Baek v. CubeNet Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09398
Plaintiff:
Anthony Baek
Defendant:
CubeNet Inc. and Byung Uk Yu
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Hattori et al v. Anand et al
as 1:2023cv11043
Plaintiff:
Mark Hattori and Susan Newman
Defendant:
Gaurav Anand, Matthew Christensen, Lydia Jett and others
Schur v. Dougan et al
as 1:2023cv10944
Plaintiff:
Peter Schur
Defendant:
Brady W. Dougan, Eric Varvel, James L Amine and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1905 Disclosure of Confidential Information
Bull v. Murphy et al
as 1:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bull
Defendant:
Thomas J. Murphy, Penko K. Ivanov, Edward J. Campanella and others
Panancherry et al v. Mehta et al
as 3:2023cv01554
Plaintiff:
Pratheesan Panancherry and Jeffrey Bastress
Defendant:
Vimal Mehta, Richard I Steinhart, Peter Mueller and others
Nominal Defendant:
BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
