Second Circuit Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 543,662
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Majtyka v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Majtyka
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Cook v. Sullivan County Family Court of New York State Unified Court System et al
as 1:2024cv03874
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Cook
Defendant:
Sullivan County Family Court of New York State Unified Court System, Judith Yates, Chief Clerk Anthony McGinty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davidson v. Office of Court Administration
as 24-1331
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVIDSON
Defendant:
OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION, Hon. LAWRENCE MARKS, in his official capacity and personally, ALIA RAZZAQ, in her official capacity as Chief Clerk of the New York City Civil Court and others
Lewis v. Affiliated Enterprise Solutions, LLC
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PHILLIP LEWIS
Defendant:
AFFILIATED ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, LLC, AES MEDICAL SUPPLY, LLC and BRIAN STEVENS
United States of America v. Adams
as 24-1339
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MELVON ADAMS
Bunten v. Donat
as 24-1344
Plaintiff:
REGINALD BROWN, PATRICIA BUNTEN, TAMIE HOLLINS and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH DONAT, GEORGE GARRISON, WILLIAM HORTON and others
Lewis v. Redline Hockey, LLC
as 24-1342
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PHILLIP LEWIS
Defendant:
REDLINE HOCKEY, LLC, DBA USA Hockey Store and USA Spirit Shop, USA HOCKEY INC., MATTHEW NYMAN and others
United States of America v. Moses
as 24-1341
Defendant:
SOMORIE MOSES, Sugar Bear, Somorie Barfield and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kanayama v. Kowal
as 24-1340
Petitioner:
MASAHIDE KANAYAMA
Respondent:
SCOTT KOWAL, Chief of U.S. Pre-Trial Services SDNY and DOES 1-10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
