Connecticut Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,291
Kennedy Johnson Schwab & Roberge, P.C. v. Does
as 3:2024cv01242
Defendant:
John Does
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Johnson Schwab & Roberge, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Nash Engineering Company
as 3:2024cv00640
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Gentlemen's Aroma Cigar & Lounge, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01177
Defendant:
Gentlemen's Aroma Cigar & Lounge, LLC doing business as Gentlemen's Aroma Cigar & Lounge, Roberto Gomez, Edwin Sepulveda and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 Unauthorized reception of signal
United Security Inc. v. Arango et al
as 3:2024cv01180
Plaintiff:
United Security Inc.
Defendant:
Prosegur Security USA and Fernando Arango
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. Dodge et al
as 3:2024cv01169
Defendant:
Jeff Dodge, Ilya Eliashevsky and Fog Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Insight Direct USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
ASSA ABLOY Sales and Marketing Group, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
ASSA ABLOY Sales and Marketing Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas Tuttle
Nunez v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 3:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Jessica Nunez
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Murray v. Connecticut College
as 3:2024cv01099
Plaintiff:
James Mt Murray
Defendant:
Connecticut College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ascent AeroSystems Inc. v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Ascent AeroSystems Inc.
Defendant:
Jeffrey T Hill, Andrew G Michael, Overwatch Aerospace LLC and others
Bankers Life and Casualty Company v. Beyer et al
as 3:2024cv01070
Plaintiff:
Bankers Life and Casualty Company
Defendant:
William Beyer and David Bellisle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
