New York Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,034
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Mint Maintenance LLC
as 1:2025cv03443
Petitioner:
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund and The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York
Respondent:
Mint Maintenance LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. P 786, Inc.
as 1:2025cv03460
Respondent:
P 786, Inc. and P
Petitioner:
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund and The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. CM Ashland Construction Corp.
as 1:2025cv03388
Petitioner:
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund and The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York
Respondent:
CM Ashland Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. IKNA Construction LLC
as 1:2025cv03395
Respondent:
IKNA Construction LLC and IKNA Construction Inc.
Petitioner:
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund and The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Alunique Construction Corp.
as 1:2025cv03398
Respondent:
Alunique Construction Corp. and Alunique Construction, Inc
Petitioner:
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund and The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Alliance Installations, Inc.
as 1:2025cv03366
Petitioner:
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund and The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York
Respondent:
Alliance Installations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, District Council No. 4 et al v. Flex Epoxy Flooring Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv00351
Plaintiff:
International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, District Council No. 4, Michael Hogan, Daniel LaFrance and others
Defendant:
Flex Epoxy Flooring Inc. and Michael Jonas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Pastreich et al v. Sentry Security International Inc.
as 1:2025cv03233
Petitioner:
the Building Service 32BJ Supplemental Retirement and Savings Fund
Respondent:
Sentry Security International Inc.
Pretrial Service:
Manny Pastreich, As Trustee, and the Trustees of the Building Service 32BJ Health Fund, and
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7101 Labor-Management Relations (Findings and Purpose)
Trustees of the New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Health Benefits Fund, Pension Fund, Legal Fund, Industry Training Fund and Scholarship Fund v. Luxurban Hotels, LLC et al
as 1:2025cv03153
Petitioner:
Trustees of the New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Health Benefits Fund, Pension Fund, Legal Fund, Scholarship Fund, and Industry Training Fund
Respondent:
Luxurban Hotels, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Pinnacle Installations LLC
as 1:2025cv02819
Petitioner:
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund and The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York
Respondent:
Pinnacle Installations LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
