New York Labor Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,919
Kilroy Architectural Windows, Inc. v. District Council 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades
as 2:2023cv06384
Plaintiff:
Kilroy Architectural Windows, Inc.
Defendant:
District Council 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers et al v. Inc.
as 1:2023cv07505
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers, Painters Local Union No. 1974 Benefit Funds, The District Council No. 9, Drywall Tapers and Painters Of Greater New York Local Union 1974, and others
Defendant:
Astoria Taping, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers et al v. KPM Construction
as 1:2023cv07495
Plaintiff:
Painters Local Union No. 1974 Benefit Funds, The District Council No. 9, Drywall Tapers and Painters Of Greater New York Local Union 1974, and Affiliated With International Union Of Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO
Petitioner:
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers
Defendant:
KPM Construction
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers et al v. Construction Inc.,
as 1:2023cv07499
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers, Painters Local Union No. 1974 Benefit Funds, The District Council No. 9, Drywall Tapers and Painters Of Greater New York Local Union 1974, and others
Defendant:
Level 5 Construction Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
Hayton v. United Parcel Service et al
as 3:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Hayton
Defendant:
United Parcel Service and Jennifer Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Cornell University v. Tompkins-Cortland Counties Building Trades Council, Maintenance Division
as 3:2023cv01021
Counter Defendant:
Cornell University
Counter Claimant:
Tompkins-Cortland Counties Building Trades Council, Maintenance Division
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO v. Tri-State Painting
as 1:2023cv07103
Petitioner:
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
Tri-State Painting
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO et al v. KPM Construction
as 1:2023cv07105
Respondent:
KPM Construction and KPM Construction Corp.
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers and Pointers Local Union No.1974 Benefit Funds
Petitioner:
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and its Local 897
as 1:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and its Local 897
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO v. KPM Construction
as 1:2023cv06538
Respondent:
KPM Construction and KPM Construction Corp.
Petitioner:
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
