U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 185
In re: Merck Mumps Vaccine Antitrust Litigation
as 23-3089
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHATOM PRIMARY CARE PC, ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, DR. ANDREW KLEIN and JOHN IVAN SUTTER, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
MERCK & CO INC
Brandywine Village Associates v. Carlino East Brandywine LP, et al
as 23-2457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDYWINE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLINO EAST BRANDYWINE LP, EAST BRANDYWINE TOWNSHIP, CHRISTINA B. WATTERS and others
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2217
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2214
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and others
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2215
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2213
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2216
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: Remicade Antitrust Litigation
as 23-1798
Appellee:
In re: REMICADE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATIONAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH PLAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, LOCAL 295 IBT EMPLOYER GROUP WELFARE FUND and WELFARE FUND OF PLUMBERS LOCAL UNION NO. 200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE GOMEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JANSSEN BIOTECH INC
Smart Communications Holding Inc, et al v. Global TelLink Corp, et al
as 22-3287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SMART COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING INC and HLFIP HOLDING INC, DBA Smart Communications IP Holdings
Defendant / Appellee:
GLOBAL TELLINK CORP, COUNTY OF YORK, YORK COUNTY PRISON and others
USA v. United States Sugar Corporation, et al
as 22-2806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SUGAR CORP, IMPERIAL SUGAR CO, LOUIS DREYFUS CO LLC and others
Appellant:
AMERICAN ECONOMIC LIBERTIES PROJECT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
