U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 553
Jane Doe v. Four Seasons Hotels Limited, et al
as 25-1445
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
FOUR SEASONS HOTELS LIMITED and FOUR SEASONS HOTEL CASABLANCA
Mark Houck, et al v. USA, et al
as 25-1433
Plaintiff:
MARK HOUCK, RYAN-MARIE HOUCK, on behalf of M.H., A.M.H., K.H., T.H., J.H., A.H., and I.H. and RYAN-MARIE HOUCK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN DOE #1, STEPHEN CAPUTO and others
Naomi Speaks v. USA, et al
as 25-1156
Plaintiff:
NAOMI SPEAKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ELWYN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Katherine Birl, et al v. Ski Shawnee Inc
as 25-1070
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE BIRL, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF G.B., A MINOR AND IN HER OWN RIGHT, DAMIAN BIRL, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF G.B., A MINOR AND IN HIS OWN RIGHT and COLLIN BIRL, IN HIS OWN RIGHT
Defendant:
SKI SHAWNEE INC
Peter Pataki v. WalMart Inc, et al
as 24-3321
Defendant:
WALMART STORE NUMBER 5447, WAL MART STORES I LP, WALMART INC and others
Plaintiff:
PETER PATAKI
Dale Morgan v. Centre County, et al
as 24-3260
Defendant:
CENTRE COUNTY, PA, SPRING TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, LUKE NELSON, Spring Township Police Officer and others
Plaintiff:
DALE MORGAN
Weizeng Liu v. The Grier School
as 24-3157
Plaintiff:
WEIZENG LIU
Defendant:
THE GRIER SCHOOL, d/b/a Grier School
Margarita Marshall v. United States Post Office, et al
as 24-3104
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POST OFFICE and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE NATIONAL TORT CENTER
Plaintiff:
MARGARITA MARSHALL
In re: NFL Players Concussion Injury Litigation, et al, et al
as 24-2839
Defendant:
JR WYATT LAW PLLC, NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, PAUL RAYMOND TURNER and others
Appellant:
GOLDBERG PERSKY & WHITE PC
Leroy Garrett v. Petroleos de Venezuela, et al
as 24-2791
Defendant:
PDV HOLDING and PETROLEOS DE VENEZUELA
Plaintiff:
LEROY A. GARRETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
