New Jersey Contract Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 277
WASH, et al., v. FINCH
as 1:2022cv01367
Plaintiff:
DAVID WASH and ZODIAC INSURANCE SERVICES INC
Defendant:
ZODIAC INSURANCE SERVICES LLC and ROBERT FINCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
HOY v. HOY et al
as 1:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
EDWARD T. HOY
Defendant:
JOHN J. HOY, III, JOHN J. HOY JR. AND JEANETTE N. HOY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and HOYS HOLLY HILL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
MEYER v. RAYAT et al
as 2:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
AVIVA MEYER
Defendant:
HARMEL S. RAYAT, THOMAS BOLD, KAIYO NEDD and others
VARGAS v. RAYAT et al
as 2:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
ZOSER VARGAS
Defendant:
HARMEL RAYAT, THOMAS BOLD, KAIYO NEDD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
TAREK HOLDINGS, LLC et al v. GREG SHOCKLEY et al
as 2:2021cv20581
Plaintiff:
Tarek Holdings, LLC and Tarek Abousalem
Defendant:
Shock Global Partners, LLC, Greg Shockley and James Shockley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tarek Holdings, LLC et al v. Shockley et al
as 2:2021cv20582
Plaintiff:
Tarek Holdings, LLC and Tarek Abousalem
Defendant:
Greg Shockley and James Shockley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STIFEL TRUST COMPANY, N.A. v. KING PROPERTIES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv20394
Plaintiff:
STIFEL TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Defendant:
KING PROPERTIES, INC., FISHER ENTERPRISES, INC. and J. DENNIS DEVINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATACHBARIAN v. ADVAXIS, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv20006
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM ATACHBARIAN
Defendant:
ADVAXIS, INC., DAVID SIDRANSKY, JAMES P. PATTON and others
VOTER v. BALUCH et al
as 2:2021cv18493
Plaintiff:
MELISSA VOTER
Defendant:
KHOSO BALUCH, JANET DILLIONE, ALAN DUNTON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
HARAZEEN v. PALMER et al
as 3:2021cv18228
Plaintiff:
AHMED HARAZEEN
Defendant:
ASHLEIGH PALMER, ANDREW DRECHSLER, JEFFREY BLUESTONE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
