U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Folgeman-Laxey v. Guillory
as 25-30132
Plaintiff:
Tara Folgeman-Laxey
Defendant:
Joshua Guillory, in his personal and official capacities, Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, Scott Morgan, in his official capacity and others
Students Engaged in Advancing Texas v. Paxton
as 25-50096
Plaintiff:
Students Engaged in Advancing Texas, M.F., by and through next friend, Vanessa Fernandez, Ampersand Group, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas
Marfil v. City of New Braunfels
as 25-50025
Plaintiff:
Rafael Marfil, Verge Productions, L.L.C., Enrico Marfil and others
Defendant:
City of New Braunfels, Texas
Spirit Aerosystems v. Paxton
as 24-50984
Defendant:
Jane Nelson, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Texas and W. Kenneth Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
Plaintiff:
Spirit Aerosystems, Incorporated
Pharm Research and Mftr v. Murrill
as 24-30673
Plaintiff:
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Defendant:
Liz Murrill, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Louisiana
Intervenor:
Louisiana Primary Care Association
AstraZeneca v. Murrill
as 24-30651
Plaintiff:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P.
Defendant:
Liz Murrill, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Louisiana
Intervenor:
Louisiana Primary Care Association
AbbVie v. Murrill
as 24-30645
Plaintiff:
Allergan Sales, L.L.C., Durata Therapeutics, Incorporated, AbbVie Products, L.L.C. and others
Intervenor:
Louisiana Primary Care Association
Defendant:
Liz Murrill, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Louisiana
Computer & Communications v. Paxton
as 24-50721
Plaintiff:
NetChoice, L.L.C. and Computer & Communications Industry Association
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
