U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,142
Rx Solutions v. Caremark
as 25-60084
Plaintiff:
Rx Solutions, Incorporated
Defendant:
Caremark, L.L.C. and CVS Pharmacy, Incorporated
Allen v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 25-10306
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Allen and Tamara La Salle Allen, also known as Tamara La Salle Roberson
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Royal American Construction v. Roofing Designs by JR
as 25-20048
Plaintiff:
Royal American Construction, Incorporated
Defendant:
Roofing Designs by JR, L.L.C., doing business as Roofing Designs
Cross-Defendant:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Sugar Bay v. CRSC
as 25-30064
Plaintiff:
Sugar Bay Club & Resort Corporation
Intervenor:
Green Earth Engineer Services Corporation
Defendant:
CRSC, L.L.C., as successor of Citadel Recovery Services, L.L.C.
Y&O Harlingen Corners Wing v. Musa
as 25-40061
Plaintiff:
Y&O Harlingen Corners Wing, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Massimo Musa, as Trustee of the First Amendment and Restatement of the Massimo Musa Revocable Trust u/t/d July 16, 2009
Weslease 2018 v. Behan
as 25-10283
Plaintiff:
Weslease 2018 Operating, L.P.
Defendant:
Linda Behan and Dale Behan
Capio Funding v. Rural/Metro Operating
as 25-10271
Plaintiff:
Capio Funding, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Rural/Metro Operating Company, L.L.C. and American Medical Response, Incorporated
Crescent City Surg v. Interstate Fire
as 25-30044
Plaintiff:
Crescent City Surgical Operating Company
Defendant:
Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, Independent Specialty Insurance Company, Velocity Risk Underwriters, L.L.C. and others
ChampionX v. AIG Insurance
as 25-20030
Plaintiff:
ChampionX Corporation
Defendant:
AIG Insurance Company of Canada and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
Wells v. Lottery.com
as 25-50037
Plaintiff:
Carl Wells
Defendant:
Lottery.com, Incorporated, doing business as Sports.com, Incorporated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
