US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 269
Milton v. Health & Human Services
as 1:2012cv00941
Plaintiff:
Ledora M Milton
Defendant:
U S Dept of Health & Human Services, Eric S Dugan and Rapides Primary Health Care Center Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Dade et al v. Clayton, III et al
as 3:2012cv00680
Plaintiff:
Michael Dade and Carl Dade
Defendant:
Robert Wadell Clayton, III , Johnny Bruce Duke McHugh , Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David et al v. Lafayette Specialty Hospital
as 6:2011cv01945
Plaintiff:
Jennifer David , J Shane David and Tanya David Mensman
Defendant:
Lafayette Specialty Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods v. USA et al
as 5:2011cv01910
Plaintiff:
Lorene B Woods
Defendant:
USA, Sheila D Washington, William Spires and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruffin v. Curzon et al
as 6:2011cv01890
Plaintiff:
Natasha Ruffin
Defendant:
Eugene Curzon, Jr and A B C Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hawthorne v. USA
as 5:2011cv00756
Plaintiff:
Sarah Hawthorne
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Sandifer et al v. USA
as 5:2011cv00675
Plaintiff:
Linda Louise Sandifer , Terrie Diane Greer , Kara Lynn Rice and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Collier v. USA
as 5:2011cv00447
Plaintiff:
Joyce Collier
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Cox et al v. Overton Brooks V A Medical Center et al
as 5:2011cv00375
Plaintiff:
Homer Ted Cox and Barbara Cox
Defendant:
Overton Brooks V A Medical Center, Miles G Clayton and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Pleasant et al v. USA
as 5:2011cv00380
Plaintiff:
Denise Pleasant , Lavardis Whitman and Chassiti Williams
Defendant:
USA, Mehreen Khan, John P Areno, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
