Mississippi Torts - Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 360
Scroggins et al v. Evans et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Defendant:
B&T Express, Inc., Traventez Evans, RLI Underwriting Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith and Tracey Scroggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Jones v. Stamps et al

as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Herbert Jones
Defendant:
Anita Stamps and Larry Stamps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Stringer v. Gram et al
as 3:2024cv00324
Defendant:
Willie Mosley, Herb Frierson, Corrinia Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lavel Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Okorie v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Ikechukwu Hyginus Okorie
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank and Erno D. Linder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Okorie v. PriorityOne Bank et al
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Ikechukwu Hyginius Okorie
Defendant:
PriorityOne Bank and Derek Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Okorie v. First Bank et al
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Ikechukwu Hyginius Okorie
Defendant:
First Bank, Eileen N. Shaffer and Timothy Matthew Farris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Evans v. Evans, et al

as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Gayle J. Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Chance J. Evans and Durant Development Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Muller et al v. PNC Bank

as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Ross J. Muller and Nicole R. Muller
Defendant:
PNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. Tate County Clerk

as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Louis L. Austin
Defendant:
Tate County Clerk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wheeler et al v. UMB Bank, N.A. et al

as 4:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Lawyer Wheeler and Ashley Selman Farms Partnership
Defendant:
UMB Bank, N.A. and Horne LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.