U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 112
Michael Vaughan v. Mary Brigham
as 11-5981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN VAUGHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY ELIZABETH BRIGHAM, aka Mary Elizabeth Kounovsky, aka Mary Elizabeth Goad
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Paul Black v. Usher Transport
as 11-3436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL BLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
USHER TRANSPORT
Kenneth Mitan, et al v. Emory Davis, et al
as 11-5341
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MITAN, FRANK MITAN and TERESA MITAN
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH MITAN
Defendant - Appellee:
EMORY DAVIS, CAROL DAVIS and VITRAMAX GROUP, INC.
Park West Galleries, Inc. v. Theresa Franks, et al
as 11-1242
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
PARK WEST GALLERIES, INC.
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
THERESA FRANKS, GLOBAL FINE ART REGISTRY, LLC and DAVID CHARLES PHILLIPS
Defendant:
BRUCE HOCHMAN, FINE ART REGISTRY and SALVADOR DALI GALLERY, INC.
Park West Galleries, Inc. v. Bruce Hochman, et al
as 11-1175
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PARK WEST GALLERIES, INC.
Defendant:
BRUCE HOCHMAN, FINE ART REGISTRY and SALVADOR DALI GALLERY, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
THERESA FRANKS, GLOBAL FINE ART REGISTRY, LLC and DAVID CHARLES PHILLIPS
Peter Newberry v. Steve Pearson, et al
as 11-3114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PETER CANAVAN NEWBERRY
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVE PEARSON, MECKLER BULGER & TILSON, aka Meckler Bulger Tilson Marick & Pearson, LLP and JOHN DOE 1-5
William Bowersock v. City of Lima, Ohio
as 11-3045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEE BOWERSOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LIMA, OHIO
Keven Forth v. Kroger Company
as 10-2465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVEN A. FORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
KROGER COMPANY
Luminita Hix v. Benny Hinn
as 10-1916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUMINITA HIX
Defendant - Appellee:
BENNY HINN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
