U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 260
Lisa Goins v. Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Inc., et al
as 22-6070
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LISA KAY GOINS
Defendant / Appellee:
SAINT ELIZABETH MEDICAL CENTER, INC., MODERNATX, INC., KROGER CO. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TRI-STATE GASTROENTEROLOGY ASSOCIATES and M.D. JOEL M. WARREN
Defendant:
KROGER COMPANY
Tina Burris v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 22-4010
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TINA BURRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Nathaniel Maysey v. Henkel Corporation, et al
as 22-6017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL EDWARD MAYSEY
Intervenor:
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
HENKEL CORPORATION and NEMAK USA, INC.
Defendant:
HENKEL AG & COMPANY, KGAA
Not Classified By Court:
MAGNA-TECH MANUFACTURING, LLC and COLORADO EXPRESS SERVICES, INC., dba Express Services, Inc.
Terry Cash-Darling v. Recycling Equipment, Inc.
as 22-5346
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY CASH-DARLING, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Paul Cash, Decedent
Defendant / Appellee:
RECYCLING EQUIPMENT, INC.
Angelo Thompson v. Ryobi Ltd, et al
as 22-1228
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELO THOMPSON
Defendant:
RYOBI LIMITED and RYOBI TOOLS
Defendant / Appellee:
TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA (TTI), ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Michael Sullivan v. LG Chem LTD, et al
as 22-1203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee:
LG CHEM LTD and LG ENERGY SOLUTION MICHIGAN, INCORPORATED
Bruce James, et al v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 19-1843
Cross Appellant:
CATERPILLAR, INC., an Illinois corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN JAMES and BRUCE W. JAMES
Bruce James, et al v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 19-1800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE W. JAMES and SUSAN JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
CATERPILLAR, INC., an Illinois corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
