U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 263
Beverly Ezra v. DCC Litigation Facility, Inc.
as 15-2215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BEVERLY J. EZRA
Defendant - Appellee:
DCC LITIGATION FACILITY, INCORPORATED
Bobby Taylor v. Southwire Tools & Equipment
as 15-6094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY TAYLOR
Intervenor - Intervenor:
EXCEL MINING, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHWIRE TOOLS & EQUIPMENT
Lorie Applebaum v. Target Corporation, et al
as 15-2198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORIE APPLEBAUM
Defendant - Appellee:
TARGET CORPORATION, NATIONAL PRODUCT SERVICES and IMPACT RESOURCES GROUP
Judith Hendrian v. Safety-Kleen Sys, Inc.
as 15-2070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUDITH A. HENDRIAN, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Howard G. Hendrian
Defendant - Appellee:
SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC.
Arthur Ruge v. Bailey Company, Inc.
as 15-5848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR A. RUGE
Defendant - Appellee:
BAILEY COMPANY, INC., dba Bailey Company, Inc. of Delaware
Josephine Wiley v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 15-5742
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPHINE WILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM'S EAST, INC.
Konecranes, Inc. v. Central Motor Wheel America
as 15-5690
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KONECRANES, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
CENTRAL MOTOR WHEEL OF AMERICA INC.
George Vaughn v. Konecranes, Inc., et al
as 15-5689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE VINCENT VAUGHN
Defendant - Appellee:
KONECRANES, INC. and CENTRAL MOTOR WHEEL OF AMERICA INC.
Clinton Thorn v. Medtronic, Inc., et al
as 15-1533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLINTON THORN
Defendant - Appellee:
MEDTRONIC, INC., a Minnesota Corporation and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., a Tennessee Corporation
Drake Edwards v. Dayton Veterans Medical Cente, et al
as 15-3402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DRAKE A. EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAYTON VETERANS MEDICAL CENTER and DON DIX, Employee at Lab Tech Blood, in his individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
