Sixth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 29,712
Rivera v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03939
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wherry et al v. AbbVie Inc.
as 2:2024cv02645
Plaintiff:
Lendale Hunt and Tiffany Wherry
Defendant:
Mike Forbess and AbbVie Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Beltran v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03936
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Beltran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ayers v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65708
Defendant:
Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., F/K/A MonoSol Rx, LLC, Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Indivior Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
April Ayers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tipton v. Indivior plc et al
as 1:2024sf65707
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Ltd., Reckitt Benckiser Lld and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Tipton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Elias v. Edge Pharma, LLC
as 4:2024cv12251
Defendant:
Edge Pharma, LLC
Plaintiff:
Patricia Elias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Santos v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03893
Plaintiff:
Rosita Santos
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Fitzpatrick v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03879
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Janice Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pickett v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 3:2024cv00478
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Plaintiff:
Willard B. Pickett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Greve v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03870
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brenda Greve
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
