US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Contract Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 247
Davis-Bey v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2014cv12315
Plaintiff:
Bobby D. Davis-Bey
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Novi, City of, Robert M. Bondy and others
Martin v. US Government et al
as 2:2014cv12177
Plaintiff:
Tiffany C. Martin
Defendant:
US Government and DTE Energy
Davis-Bey v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2014cv12167
Plaintiff:
Bobby DeAndre Davis-Bey
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Southfield, City of, Matthew Taylor and others
Taylor v. U.S. Government et al
as 2:2014cv12143
Plaintiff:
Betty June Taylor
Defendant:
U.S. Government and Detroit, City of
FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. Earl Daup Signs, LTD et al
as 2:2014cv11979
Plaintiff:
FirstMerit Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Earl Daup Signs, LTD, Gerald H. Daup, Daniel L. Daup and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. Earl Daup Signs, LTD et al
as 4:2014cv11979
Plaintiff:
FirstMerit Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Earl Daup Signs, LTD, Gerald H. Daup, Daniel L. Daup and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
River Birch Bend Two LLC v. Dilorenzo et al
as 2:2014cv11845
Plaintiff:
River Birch Bend Two LLC
Defendant:
Vincent Dilorenzo and Angela Tinervia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. 200 Main, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv11059
Plaintiff:
FirstMerit Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
200 Main, LLC, Dennis Jaboro and SABAH JABORO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Credit Acceptance Corporation et al
as 5:2014cv11031
Plaintiff:
Betty June Taylor
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation and United States Government
Comerica Bank v. Towers of Southfield, LLC
as 2:2014cv10928
Plaintiff:
Comerica Bank
Defendant:
Towers of Southfield, LLC, PNC Bank National Association, Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
