Middle District of Tennessee Other Statutes Cases

Cases filed


Cases 21 - 30 of 3,880
Doe et al v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County Tennessee
as 3:2017cv01209
Plaintiff: Sally Doe , Sally Doe #2
Defendant: Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County Tennessee
Cause Of Action: Title IX of Education Amendment of 1972
Wilcox v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2017cv01202
Plaintiff: Nichole Wilcox
Defendant: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP , McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Hair v. Nordstrom, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01194
Plaintiff: Sarah Hair
Defendant: Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01192
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
Thomas et al v. Thomas et al
as 3:2017mc00011
Plaintiff: Adam Thomas
Defendant: Barbara Thomas, Santa Fe Trust, Inc.
Dorris v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv01182
Plaintiff: Anna Dorris
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corp.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Altruist, LLC v. Medex Patient Transport, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01179
Petitioner: Altruist, LLC
Respondent: Medex Patient Transport, LLC , Klein Calvert , Kyle Calvert
Cause Of Action: Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Kerr v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv01183
Plaintiff: Phyllis Kerr
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corp.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
v. Daniel Patrick Gibbs
as 3:2017mc00010
Petitioner: Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
Respondent: Daniel Patrick Gibbs
Lovell v. Howmedic Osteonics d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics et al
as 3:2017cv01168
Plaintiff: Donald Ray Lovell
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics , Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?