US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Social Security Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,888
Scull v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01487
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Scull
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Simon v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Amy Marie Simon
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Krick v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv01471
Plaintiff:
Peter Krick
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robertson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Edgar R Robertson
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cartwright v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01412
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cartwright, Jr. and Joseph Cartwright, Jr
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thielen v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Thielen
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
White v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01379
Plaintiff:
Leon Eugene White
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Butz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01373
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Butz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smet v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01352
Plaintiff:
Sheila Smet
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Beierle v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv01344
Plaintiff:
Amber Beierle
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
