US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Social Security Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,780
Phillips v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01583
Plaintiff:
Aikaterini Phillips
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Walker v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Doris V Walker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of Social Security Disability Benefits and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Shelton v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01318
Plaintiff:
Bruce Shelton
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hudson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50067
Plaintiff:
Nanette Hudson
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bryant v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01040
Plaintiff:
Tobias Bryant
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Vortes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Vortes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Moore v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50054
Plaintiff:
George W. Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reid v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Reid
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Segundo v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Segundo
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Thomas v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Bruce D. Thomas
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
