US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,137
USA v. Cunningham
as 1:2022cv04979
Petitioner:
Giavonni Cunningham
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Gennell
as 1:2022cv04467
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pierre Gennell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Osborne
as 1:2022cv04484
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Bryan Osborne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Sfeir
as 1:2022cv04265
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jorge Sfeir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
USA v. Rodriguez
as 1:2022cv04024
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Fontaine Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Norwood
as 1:2022cv03780
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Deronarte Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Hester
as 1:2022cv03657
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Andrew Hester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Collins
as 1:2022cv03688
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Larry Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Wright
as 1:2022cv03505
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Quincy Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Smith
as 3:2022cv50201
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.