Wisconsin Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,095
BenShot LLC v. BML REC LLC
as 1:2025cv00390
Plaintiff:
BenShot LLC
Defendant:
BML REC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Ermert, Falco v. Sandy @ Travel Experts of La Crosse LLC
as 3:2025cv00191
Plaintiff:
Falco Ermert
Defendant:
Sandy @ Travel Experts of La Crosse LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Best Bee Brothers LLC v. Blazer
as 2:2025cv00365
Plaintiff:
Best Bee Brothers LLC
Defendant:
Brian Robert Blazer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe

as 2:2025cv00346
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe

as 2:2025cv00347
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2025cv00345
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2025cv00348
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2025cv00349
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Paragon Component Systems, LLC v. Qualtim, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv00170
Plaintiff:
Paragon Component Systems LLC
Defendant:
Qualtim, Inc., Center for Building Innovation LLC, DrJ Engineering LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
GFL Solid Waste Midwest, LLC et al v. Nieuwenhuis Disposal Services, LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00336
Plaintiff:
GFL Solid Waste Midwest, LLC and GFL Everglades Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Nieuwenhuis Disposal Services, LLC and Dustin Nieuwenhuis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.