Wisconsin Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,496
Jedlowski, Joseph v. Colvin, Carolyn
as 3:2024cv00888
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Joseph John Jedlowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dudka v. Colvin
as 1:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Jamie R Dudka
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2024cv01573
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Social Security Administration and US as Party
Plaintiff:
Drusilla A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lee v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01466
Plaintiff:
Cory A Lee
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Deeter, Nathan v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Nathan P. Deeter
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Gray, Bernard v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Bernard Eugene Gray, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01440
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jennifer M Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Slaney, Sharon v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Sharon Marie Slaney
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Estes, Natasha v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Natasha Estes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2024cv01380
Defendant:
Mr Simmons, Michael Aragon, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Drusilla A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.