Wisconsin Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 136
Khami v. Generac Holdings Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01343
Plaintiff:
Nahil Khami
Defendant:
Generac Holdings Inc, Aaron Jagdfeld and York A Ragen
Petitioner:
Carey Don Procter
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Shillin, Michael
as 3:2021cv00601
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Michael F. Shillin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Egbon
as 2:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission and United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Blessing K Egbon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Narvett
as 1:2021cv00291
Defendant:
Robert Narvett
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Klein et al vs Sullivan et al
as 2:2021cv00283
Defendant:
Justin Fish, Jean Marie Canan, Donn J Viola and others
Nominal Defendant:
REV Group Inc
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein and Travis Voll
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Southwest Services LLC, et al
as 1:2020cv01440
Defendant:
Southwest Services, LLC a/k/a South West Services, LLC, Timothy A. Sack, Southwest Services LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
v. Southwest Services, LLC a/k/a South West Services, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01439
Defendant:
Southwest Services, LLC a/k/a South West Services, LLC and Timothy A. Sack
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Matthes
as 2:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Edward E Matthes
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walczak, Edward
as 3:2020cv00076
Defendant:
Edward Walczak
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Walczak, Edward
as 3:2020cv00075
Defendant:
Edward Walczak
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
