U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 16,508
David Fink v. Kathleen Allison
as 23-55546
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID FINK
Respondent / Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON
Jose Alvarez v. Brian Williams, et al
as 23-15918
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE IRAEL ALVAREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Levar Brown v. Michael Martel
as 23-55536
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEVAR BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden
James Riani v. M. Gutierrez
as 23-15909
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES JASON RIANI
Respondent / Appellee:
M. GUTIERREZ, Warden
Tiyacte Harris v. Natalie Wood, et al
as 23-15896
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIYACTE HARRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
NATALIE WOOD, Chief of the Nevada Division of Parole and Probation, CHAD HASTINGS, Captain of the Southern Command of the Nevada Division of Parole and Probation, AARON FORD, Attorney General of the State of Nevada and others
James Noffsinger v. The Board of Parole CSP Solano
as 23-55530
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES D. NOFFSINGER
Respondent / Appellee:
THE BOARD OF PAROLE CSP SOLANO
Edward Ware v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15899
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD MAURICE WARE
Respondent / Appellee:
` DAVID SHINN, Director, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and RYAN THORNELL
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15888
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
UNKNOWN PARTY
Ulises Gutierrez v. Brian Cates
as 23-55527
Petitioner / Appellant:
ULISES GUTIERREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN CATES, Warden
Eddie Thomas, Jr. v. State of Nevada, et al
as 23-15884
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDDIE JAMES THOMAS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, TIM GARRENT, L.C.C. Warden and AARON FORD, Att.Gen. for the State of Nev.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
