U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 176
USA v. Michael Brandner, et al
as 14-55486
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRANDNER and EVERGREEN CAPITAL, LLC
Defendant:
$4,656,085.10 IN BANK FUNDS
USA v. 299,912.00 in Account Fund
as 14-55007
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
299,912.00 IN ACCOUNT FUNDS
Movant - Appellant:
STEPHEN YAGMAN
USA v. Toby McAdam, et al
as 13-36201
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TOBY CARL MCADAM, DBA Risingsun Health
Defendant:
GRETA S. ARMSTRONG, DBA Risingsun Health
USA v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, et al
as 13-56823
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures
Defendant:
475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property Located at
USA v. A Real Property Located in Lo
as 13-56800
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
A REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN LOS ANGELES, Vyacheslav Astakhov
USA v. Maria Ferro
as 13-56707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellee:
MARIA FERRO
Defendant:
1,679 FIREARMS
USA v. 26,829.00 In U S Currency, et al
as 13-56479
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
NICK TRIPODIS and JOVAN CLYDE SMITH
Defendant:
26,829.00 IN U S CURRENCY
USA v. 1,679 Firearms, et al
as 13-56425
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
MARIA FERRO
Defendant:
1,679 FIREARMS
Wilsonis Ayala-Villanueva v. USA
as 13-16419
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILSONIS AYALA-VILLANUEVA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Leonardo Cornejo-Reynoso, et al
as 13-16370
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
LEONARDO CORNEJO-REYNOSO
Defendant:
$2,164,341.00 IN US CURRENCY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
