U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Cases

Cases filed

Cases 41 - 50 of 98,601
Enzo Forcellati, et al v. Hyland's, Inc., et al
as 17-56403
Plaintiff - Appellee: ENZO FORCELLATI, on Behalf of Himself and all Others Similarly Situated, LISA ROEMMICH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Objector - Appellant: PATRICK S. SWEENEY
Jack Finnegan v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 17-56404
Plaintiff - Appellant: JACK R. FINNEGAN
Defendant - Appellee: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., JAYME L. BOWMAN, FKA Jayme Heller
Arthur Lopez v. Tustin Police Department, et al
as 17-56405
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARTHUR LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee: TUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF TUSTIN, MICHELLE ZACHARIAH, Tustin Police Department, individual capacity and others
Arthur Lopez v. Costa Mesa Police Department, et al
as 17-56406
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARTHUR LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee: COSTA MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF COSTA MESA, CHRISTOPHER WALK, Costa Mesa Police Department Badge No. 431, in individual capacity and others
Joshua Thrailkill v. Top Rank, Inc., et al
as 17-56399
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSHUA THRAILKILL, On Behalf of Himself, and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee: TOP RANK, INC., ROBERT ARUM, TODD DUBOEF and others
Manuel Ortiz Gordillo v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72600
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Dewoyne Potts v. John Garza
as 17-56410
Petitioner - Appellant: DEWOYNE CURTIS POTTS
Respondent - Appellee: JOHN GARZA
Victor Durden v. Raymond Madden
as 17-56409
Petitioner - Appellant: VICTOR DURDEN
Respondent - Appellee: RAYMOND MADDEN
Markham Bond v. USA
as 17-56408
Petitioner - Appellant: MARKHAM DAVID BOND
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jorge Samudio v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72599
Petitioner: JORGE SAMUDIO, AKA Jorge Sanchez Samudio, AKA Jorge Sanchez-Samudio
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?