Ninth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 191 - 200 of 892
Federal Trade Commission v. Breathometer, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00314
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Breathometer, Inc. and Charles Michael Yim
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
C.L. Services, Inc. v. Cornerstone Transport
as 2:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
C.L. Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Cornerstone Transport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
C.L. Services, Inc. v. Cornerstone Transport, LLC
as 2:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
C.L. Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Cornerstone Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Hawaii v. Mark Diaz
as 16-17278
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF HAWAII
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK A. DIAZ
American Freightways, L.P. v. Jose E. Garcia dba Chale Trucking
as 2:2016cv09150
Plaintiff:
American Freightways, L.P.
Defendant:
Does and Jose E. Garcia
Heritage International, Inc. v. SMBAT KG Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08991
Defendant:
DOES, Landstar Global Logistics, Inc., Arsen Movsisyan and others
Plaintiff:
Heritage International, Inc.
State of Hawaii v. Diaz
as 1:2016cv00608
Plaintiff:
State of Hawaii
Defendant:
Mark A. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Asante, et al v. California Department of Healt, et al
as 16-17080
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ASANTE, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Nevada non profit corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES and JENNIFER KENT, Director of the California Department of Healthcare Services
California Expanded Metal Products Co. v. Jack Pedowitz Enterprises, Inc
as 2:2016cv08279
Plaintiff:
California Expanded Metal Products Co.
Defendant:
Jack Pedowitz Enterprises, Inc
Gregorio v. United Parcel Service Ground Freight, Inc.
as 2:2016cv02515
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Ground Freight, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ozzie Gregorio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
