Ninth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 1,333
Abante Rooter and Plumbing, Inc. v. Signify Health, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv06234
Plaintiff:
Abante Rooter and Plumbing, Inc.
Defendant:
Signify Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Medina v. Barclays Bank Delaware
as 3:2023cv02209
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Medina
Defendant:
Barclays Bank Delaware
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Medina v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Medina
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Williams v. Capital One, N.A.
as 3:2023cv02208
Plaintiff:
Darcy Williams
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Williams v. Ally Bank
as 3:2023cv02210
Plaintiff:
Darcy Williams
Defendant:
Ally Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Castillo v. Discover Bank
as 3:2023cv02206
Plaintiff:
Rogerio Castillo
Defendant:
Discover Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Omahony v. US Bank National Association
as 3:2023cv02192
Plaintiff:
Troy A Omahony
Defendant:
US Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Asher Bronstin v. Solcius, LLC
as 8:2023cv02255
Plaintiff:
Asher Bronstin
Defendant:
Solcius, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Charman v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02184
Plaintiff:
Thane Charman
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc. doing business as Spectrum
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nipper v. Penn Foster, LLC
as 1:2023cv01655
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nipper
Defendant:
Penn Foster, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
