US District Court for the Central District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 84,681
In Re: Biologic therapies, Inc.
as 2:2024mc00059
Debtor:
Bilogic Therapies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gordon P. Jones
Defendant:
Luke Whalen
Land and Warehouse LLC et al v. Revvity Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03438
Defendant:
Industrial Assets Revitalization, Inc., Revvity, Inc., Industrial Assets Environmental Remediation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Land and Warehouse LLC, Canterbury Enterprise, Inc. doing business as Mega Produce, Toupan Tommy Salim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carlton X. Mathews v. Kia Hyundai Hehicle
as 2:2024cv03443
Plaintiff:
Carlton X. Mathews
Defendant:
Kia Hyundai Hehicle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
William Milton v. Ernest C Roe
as 2:2001cv04090
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
