US District Court for the Central District of California Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Stephanie Mrazik v. C.H. Robinson Company et al
as 8:2012cv02067
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Company, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and DOES
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Mrazik
James Joseph O'Doherty v. United Parcel Service Co et al
as 5:2011cv01529
Defendant:
John Anderson, Does and United Parcel Service Co
Plaintiff:
James Joseph O'Doherty
Wendesen Dula et al v. Calop Business Systems, Inc.
as 2:2010cv04091
Counter Claimant:
Calop Business Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Calop Business Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wendesen Dula and Service Employees International Union Local 1877
Counter Defendant:
Service Employees International Union Local 1877
Judy Hamada et al v. United Airlines Inc et al
as 2:2010cv03205
Defendant:
Does, The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local 1932 and others
Plaintiff:
Judy Hamada, Cynthia Jones, Rosalie Leifi and others
Gina Wood v. United Air Lines Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01212
Defendant:
Jeanette Cheimowitz, Does, Lee Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Gina Wood
Robert C Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
as 2:2008cv02240
Petitioner:
Robert C Konop
Respondent:
Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 2:2007cv07986
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Christine Bader v. United Airlines Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02337
Plaintiff:
Christine Bader
Defendant:
United Airlines Inc, Frank Colosi, Latricia Earley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
