US District Court for the Eastern District of California Labor Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 1,783
Ramirez v. Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC
as 2:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
Angelica Ramirez
Defendant:
Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ramirez v. Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC
as 2:2023at00642
Plaintiff:
Angelica Ramirez
Defendant:
Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC
Zapata v. Hair Club For Men, LLC
as 2:2023at00636
Plaintiff:
Laura Zapata
Defendant:
Hair Club For Men, LLC and DOES 1-100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Skutley v. Walgreen Co.
as 2:2023cv01193
Plaintiff:
Brandy L. Skutley
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Polousy v. Medline Industries, LP
as 1:2023at00508
Plaintiff:
Jeyson Polousy
Defendant:
Medline Industries, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Polousy v. Medline Industries, LP et al
as 2:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
Jeyson Polousy
Defendant:
Medline Industries, LP and Randstad North Amreica, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Cashpal v. Gesick Concrete, Inc.
as 2:2023at00564
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cashpal
Defendant:
Gesick Concrete, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Cashpal v. Gesick Concrete, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cashpal
Defendant:
Gesick Concrete, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Dixon et al v. Oldcastle Infrastructure, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dixon and Jeremy Wood
Defendant:
Oldcastle Infrastructure, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dixon et al v. Oldcastle Infrastructure, Inc.
as 1:2023at00497
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dixon and Jeremy Wood
Defendant:
Oldcastle Infrastructure, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
