California Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 35,813
Menzel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv02400
Plaintiff:
Erik Menzel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Oreginal M. Carr v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv03365
Plaintiff:
Oreginal M. Carr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mike Bowman v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Mike Bowman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Claudia Marian Sharp v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Claudia Marian Sharp
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Palmer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Anthony Palmer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
(SS) Kieffer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alan Kieffer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Toussaint v. O' Malley
as 3:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Rudy Toussiant
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 rs Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Kelley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Mark Kelley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Alfonso Lepe v. Martin J. OMalley
as 5:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Lepe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Noe Valdez v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03339
Plaintiff:
Noe Valdez
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
