California Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 25,005
Witt v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02362
Plaintiff:
Leonard Witt
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
N. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02352
Plaintiff:
P. N.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Salazar v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00702
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C. and Does 1 to 25
Plaintiff:
Delfino Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Mathew et al v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02291
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mathew and Lisa Mathew
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lewis et al v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02287
Plaintiff:
Seth Lewis and Ashley Lewis
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kroll v. Future Motion Inc.
as 5:2024cv02290
Plaintiff:
Jeff Kroll
Defendant:
Future Motion Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dockery et al v. Future Motion Inc.
as 5:2024cv02300
Plaintiff:
Craig Dockery and Dierdre Dockery
Defendant:
Future Motion Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kington v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02295
Plaintiff:
Randal Kington
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Graham v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02297
Plaintiff:
Kyle Graham
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Babbino et al v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Babbino and Christina Babbino
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
