Nevada Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 6,995
Hardiman v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Andre Hardiman
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Kara LaGrand, Mr. Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hymon v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv01918
Plaintiff:
Roderick L. Hymon
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center Medical, Steven B Wolfson and Sheriff Kevin McMahill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hymon v. D. Jones; P#8120
as 2:2023cv01917
Plaintiff:
Roderick L. Hymon
Defendant:
D. Jones; P#8120
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. CCDC Medical Staff
as 2:2023cv01914
Plaintiff:
Roger Robinson
Defendant:
CCDC Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hymon v. Sittre, et al
as 2:2023cv01916
Plaintiff:
Roderick L. Hymon
Defendant:
Nicole Sittre, Quarstrom, Trost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunn v. Ely State Prison et al
as 3:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Noel Nunn
Defendant:
Ely State Prison, City of Ely, County of White Pine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hardcourt et al
as 2:2023cv01897
Plaintiff:
Keiton Smith
Defendant:
Maxwell Hardcourt, C. Castiglioni and NDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Price
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Washoe County Jail, Jennifer Raines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunn v. District of Nevada
as 3:2023cv00576
Petitioner:
Tyrone Noel Nunn
Respondent:
District of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
Jamelle Russell
Defendant:
LeGrand, Vaughn, Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
