US District Court for the District of Alaska Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 176
Turner v. Munro
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Beau Turner
Defendant:
Frederik Munro
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1101 Violation of Maritime Regulations
McLeod v. F/V Icy Mist, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
James Michael McLeod
Defendant:
F/V Icy Mist, LLC, Robert J. Gunderson, Jennifer K. Gunderson and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Maxwell v. Wiese et al
as 3:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Robert Maxwell
Defendant:
Robert Wiese and F/V REBEL, AK hull no. AK4584AM
Grigg v. F/V DEER COVE, U.S. Coast Guard Official Number 925243 et al
as 3:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Cody Grigg
Defendant:
F/V DEER COVE, U.S. Coast Guard Official Number 925243, Chris Bourgeois, Susan Bourgeois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Haynes v. Estate of Gary Lin Haynes
as 1:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Ole D Haynes
Defendant:
Estate of Gary Lin Haynes
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Wright v. WARHORSE, O.N. 526288
as 3:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Wright
Defendant:
WARHORSE, O.N. 526288
Pugh v. Pearl Bay Seafoods, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Alan Dale Pugh
Defendant:
Pearl Bay Seafoods, LLC and THE M/V GLACIER BAY, OFFICIAL NUMBER 600325
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Sportsman v. Trident Seafoods Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Kana'I Sportsman
Defendant:
Trident Seafoods Corporation, Harold Bruce Magnusson and F/V Breanna Holly
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Johnson v. Winegarden et al
as 3:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
Nicholas B. Johnson
Defendant:
Jeffrey D. Winegarden and F/V Hazel A, O.N. 577216
Winter v. M/V HAPPY HOOKER III et al
as 3:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
Phillip Winter
Defendant:
M/V HAPPY HOOKER III (AK No. AK2191P), Yakutat Adventures, LLC and Stephen John Spring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
