US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Labor Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 145
Hill v. Jim Burke Automotive et al
as 2:2012cv02381
Plaintiff:
Jack Hill
Defendant:
Jim Burke Automotive and John Morris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Walker v. ITT Educational Services Inc
as 2:2012cv01819
Plaintiff:
Bellinda Walker
Defendant:
ITT Educational Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Scott v. Walker County Board of Education et al
as 6:2012cv01808
Plaintiff:
Rita Scott
Defendant:
Walker County Board of Education, Alan Trotter, Vonda Beaty and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Williams v. United HealthCare of Alabama Inc
as 2:2012cv00988
Plaintiff:
Natalie Williams
Defendant:
United HealthCare of Alabama Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Branch v. Wendy's Arby's Group (WAG)
as 2:2012cv00677
Plaintiff:
Amy Branch
Defendant:
Jeff Collins and Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc
Counter_claimant:
Jeff Collins and Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc
Counter_defendant:
Amy Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Sealing Equipment Products Co Inc et al
as 2:2011cv04330
Plaintiff:
Frederick Russell
Defendant:
Sealing Equipment Products Co Inc, Mike Evers and Glenn Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Coppett v. Tennessee Valley Authority et al
as 5:2011cv04227
Plaintiff:
Johnny Coppett
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority, Tom Kilgore, Dennis Bottorff and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Heuring v. Madison County, Alabama
as 5:2011cv03895
Plaintiff:
Terry W. Heuring
Defendant:
Madison County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holder v. Methodist Home for the Aging
as 2:2011cv03593
Plaintiff:
Waynis Joyce Holder
Defendant:
Methodist Home for the Aging
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 1657 v. SouthFresh Farms, LLC
as 7:2011cv02687
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 1657
Defendant:
SouthFresh Farms, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
